First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. For example, the book of Acts never records the death of Paul, which occurred in about 64, or the destruction of Jerusalem, which occurred in The historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and widespread.
This means we must each come to God the same way--as a sinner who recognizes his sinfulness, repudiates any form of human works for salvation, and relies totally on Christ alone by faith alone for our salvation.
A Theological and Philosophical Absurdity There are always those who say the historical fact of a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ is not important. These three truths create a strongly woven, three chord rope that cannot be broken.
Ancient Evidence for Jesus from Non-Christian Sources Although there is overwhelming evidence that the New Testament is an accurate and trustworthy historical document, many people are still reluctant to believe what it says unless there is also some independent, non-biblical testimony that corroborates its statements.
Without entering as the other women did, she returns to Peter and John. Most scholars think the core of the passage originated with Josephus, but that it was later altered by a Christian editor, possibly between the third and fourth century A.
The Evidence of the Stone Matthew If they were apprehended, it meant automatic execution by crucifixion upside down. It has far reaching implications on our lives. As far as we know, the first author outside the church to mention Jesus is the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote a history of Judaism around AD The historian Luke wrote of "authentic evidence" concerning the resurrection.
The difficulties of belief may be great, but the problems inherent in unbelief present even greater difficulties. At one end was a special elevated place for the head. I think the answer is clear: So the early source Mark used puts the testimony of the empty tomb too early to be legendary.
What caused them to go everywhere telling the message of the risen Christ. Further, the hallucination theory cannot explain the conversion of Paul, three years later. It is worth noting, though, that the two mainstream historians who have written most against these hypersceptical arguments are atheists: Rather, they went right back to the city of Jerusalem, where, if what they were teaching was false, the falsity would be evident.
Unsupported by the psychological principles governing the appearances of hallucinations, this theory also does not coincide with the historical situation.
It is also difficult to imagine why Christian writers would invent such a thoroughly Jewish saviour figure in a time and place — under the aegis of the Roman empire — where there was strong suspicion of Judaism. Since the disciples could not have been lying or hallucinating, we have only one possible explanation left:.
The proof of that, above all proofs, is His amazing resurrection. The Roman Caesars are all dead, Mohammed is dead, Karl Marx is dead, Buddha is dead—name these false religionists one by one.
They eventually die—and stay dead! Ancient Evidence for Jesus from Non-Christian Sources.
Finally, the claim that on the third day Jesus appeared to His disciples restored to life, inasmuch as it affirms Jesus' resurrection, is quite unlikely to come from a non-Christian!
Ancient Evidence for Jesus from Non-Christian Sources. Michael Gleghorn. In addition to the massive historical evidence for the resurrection, I believe there is scientific evidence for the resurrection, and it is to be found in the Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth 14 feet by 3 feet, that purports to be the actual burial cloth of Jesus Christ.
The silence of Christ's enemies and the lack of historical evidence against the resurrection is almost as strong an evidence as the positive evidences for the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
I have in my library a book covering a debate between Gary Habermas and Anthony Flew entitled, Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?, the Resurrection Debate. The historicity and origin of the resurrection of Jesus has been the subject of historical research and debate, the stories of the resurrection were originally epiphanies in which the disciples are called to a ministry by the risen Jesus and were interpreted as physical proof of the event at a secondary stage.
He contends that the more. "I am not able to explain away an event in history—the resurrection of Jesus Christ." REAL PROOF: THE DISCIPLES' LIVES On the basis of all the evidence for Christ's resurrection, and considering the fact that Jesus offers forgiveness of sin and an eternal relationship with God, who would be so foolhardy as to reject Him?.Proof of jesus resurrection